The persons sitting in the presence of Hadrat Mufti-e-Azam-e-Hind radi Allahu anhu always observed him expressing annoyance when he saw anybody wearing a Tie around his neck. Further, he used to call it the signs of the Christians. The verdict of Hadrat Mufti-e-Azam Hind radi Allahu anhu is re-enforced with some reasons: and that they did not crucify him, but that Allah made for them one like him. Certainly, they never killed him. This part is also sacred and respectable in the beliefs of Christians as well as the full Cross.
|Published (Last):||14 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||18.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The persons sitting in the presence of Hadrat Mufti-e-Azam-e-Hind radi Allahu anhu always observed him expressing annoyance when he saw anybody wearing a Tie around his neck. Further, he used to call it the signs of the Christians. The verdict of Hadrat Mufti-e-Azam Hind radi Allahu anhu is re-enforced with some reasons: and that they did not crucify him, but that Allah made for them one like him.
Certainly, they never killed him. This part is also sacred and respectable in the beliefs of Christians as well as the full Cross. It is also clear by the above-mentioned facts that they the Christians consider making the sign of the Cross even with their hands in the air as a means of prosperity. Hence, why would they not consider to keep the sign of the full Cross or part of the Cross as a reason of grace! Certainly, according to their tenet, this is a reason of compassion; this is the Tie, which Christians use to tie around their necks.
But, by a little deliberation, it is also clear that the whole Cross is existent on the Tie. This is because when the knot is made after having put the strip around the neck, two strips cross each other at the same time point on that knot and these two strips lie on the collar-bone making this form.
It shows the Cross structure and the stranglehold apparently. Now, if you put a pin to it, then another Cross is formed. This is clear by the given form. So the Tie represents the Cross by some means and brings the remembrance of the crucifixion to the Christians. In short, the Tie is quite a Cross including the knot, which is the redundant thing.
In the same manner, you compare the bow-tie with a neck-tie. The form of the Cross is existing, meanwhile, the bow-tie is tied around the neck as it appears by the given form.
The Cross, as well as anything like the Cross, is the religious symbol of the Christians. Now, either you admit that the tie is a Cross or you accept that it is similar to the Cross. On both the conditions: that it is a religious sign of the Christians, and whichever thing that is considered to be a sign of non-Muslims would not be legitimate on any account even if, Allah forbid, that it becomes common in any manner.
But the Tie has got so much importance amongst Christians that they put the Tie on the dead body also. So, indeed, it is their customary manner, which makes Muslims deserve disgrace and Hell.
Muslims cannot have the legitimacy to use it. Muslims must strictly abstain from it and must also not wear shirts and pants, etc. Muslims have to revive their culture, which is present in the Sunnat, i. They must not put on the Tie in the name of job, etc. Muslims must rely on Allah and repose confidence in the Holy Prophet sallal laahu alaihi wasallam. They must resist the unlawful conditions of others vigorously.
Of course, Muslims will ultimately meet with success as Allah promises to help you if you assist His religion. So, Muslims must not accept on any account a job or post when he is forced to use a Tie or to accept such illegitimate conditions because the hypocrisy and dullness in religious affairs is a violent detriment to the religion and it causes the Anger of Allah.
As it is said in the Holy Quran: If Allah is Angry, Allah forbid, nobody can assist you in the whole universe and if Allah leaves you, then there is no helper for you. So there is no need for any other evidence.
Even then, all Muslims and non-Muslims agree to the fact that the Tie is a symbol of Christianity as it appeared many times during enquiry from people. It happened just last year that a convert Muslim told me that the Tie was considered as a dress of respect to the Church. Hence, find out the insight of Hadrat Mufti-e-Azam Hind radi Allahu anhu radi Allahu anhu has got a great reach in this field. Certainly, a theologian must be such that he must have awareness about the people of his time, despite having no contact with them.
On any account a little difference is enough to escape likeness. Please clarify. May Allah reward you. ANSWER: Whichever of these , which are considered to be symbols of non-Muslims or of sinful and disobedient persons, it is absolutely forbidden to adopt it willingly without a lawful reason, even if it is a single thing for it that will certainly bring resemblance with them in this very way. This very reason is enough to inhibit its use , notwithstanding, no resemblance exists in other manners.
It is just like the rose and urine. In case there is a full glass of rose water which has one drop of urine, the entire glass is impure as well, as if it is full of urine.
It has two sorts, i the religious sign of non-Muslims, e. Hindus cross-thread and special cap of Christians, that is, the hat ii specially belonging to the non-Muslim nation but regarded as the symbol of their religion.
It is also prohibited. Fatawa Razvia, Part 2, Vol.
AZHARUL FATAWA PDF
In Fiji there is a grave of Wali who came from India and Muslims they visit and respect to that blessed places in the town Navua. The Wali had also shown great Karamaat and even today it can be experienced whosoever visits the graves. The Wahabies claim it is un-Islamic to visit such places. Please provide a Fatawa regarding the cited subject and there is no Muslim Sunni Mufti currenty in Fiji and it is for reason I have knocked your door. ANSWER In this regard, I have to say that Wahabism is based on disrespecting the Prophets and Saints of Allah and they do not believe in their authority and miracles and so claim that visiting graves and shrines are anti- Islamic and settle such action contrary to the teachings of Islam and say that Muslims should refrain from visiting the graves and shrines and even performing worship at those places. They are misled and every baseless act of Wahabis is against Islamic faith.
Kazilmaran Zaid used to wear the coat, shirt with collar and neck-tie, Fatawaa cap and pish waripyjama and boots and has his hair done in English fashion. I conclude with these few words: In this regard the verses of the Holy Quran i. Emblem of Akhtar Raza Khan. As it is said in the Holy Quran: There is a Hadith from the Holy Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wasallam which states that: Both the Muftis have adopted a non-preferable opinion and it is forbidden at all to adopt a non-preferable view as it is well known to the Muftis, who are aware of the Rules of Ifta issuing verdict.
Tygogis Azhar-ul-Fatawa ftaawa A unique aspect of the mode of expression of his Fatawa is the intense care that he takes in using the appropriate terms to maintain conciseness and clarity. It legitimizes to follow the sinners only in such a condition while refraining from their leadership may raise hue and cry. So the above Fatawa of the Ulama-e-Haramain, etc. Usury cannot take place between a Mussulman and a hostile infidel in a hostile country. They are certainly apostate and struck off the circle of Islam due to their wrong tenets and beliefs, which are contrary to Islam. On which condition is the profit considered as est?